No name
Quam Singulari (Decree on First Communion)
Quotes to Ponder on Children and Education
Reading Your Way Through History
Abbreviations: BV - The Book of Virtues ed. by William Bennett (Simon & Schuster) CHS - Celtic Heritage Saints by Marian Keaney (Veritas Press) EM - Eucharistic Miracles by Joan Carroll Cruz (TAN) HB - The Holy Bible (recommended translations - The Ignatius Bible or the Douay Rheims) HL - The Harp and Laurel Wreath ed. by Laura Berquist (Ignatius Press) MC - The Moral Compass ed. by William Bennett (Simon & Schuster) PF - Pope Fiction by Patrick Madrid (Basilica Press) RC + Volume Number - Reading Comprehension, Stories of the Saints (Catholic Heritage Curricula) TC - The Treasury of Catholic Wisdom ed. by John Hardon, S.J. (Ignatius Press)
Reciprocal Links
I'm adding sites as I stumble upon them. Please e-mail me, webmaster at love2learn dot net if your site links to ours and you'd like to be added to this list.
Red Flag - The Institute for Creation Research
The Bible, consisting of the thirty-nine canonical books of the Old Testament and the twenty-seven canonical books of the New Testament, is the divinely-inspired revelation of the Creator to man. Its unique, plenary, verbal inspiration guarantees that these writings, as originally and miraculously given, are infallible and completely authoritative on all matters with which they deal, free from error of any sort, scientific and historical as well as moral and theological. (ICR Tenet #2)The Catholic Church recognizes 46 books of the Old Testament (not 39) and 27 books of the New Testament. Why should this be of concern? Catholics could not agree to this statement of faith, because it is contradictory to our faith (however minor it may seem). This is the first indication that ICR is not just interested in supporting a creationist viewpoint, but in trying to justify a very specific and Protestant understanding of the Bible.
All things in the universe were created and made by God in the six literal days of the creation week described in Genesis 1:1-2:3, and confirmed in Exodus 20:8-11. The creation record is factual, historical, and perspicuous; thus all theories of origins or development which involve evolution in any form are false. All things which now exist are sustained and ordered by God's providential care. However, a part of the spiritual creation, Satan and his angels, rebelled against God after the creation and are attempting to thwart His divine purposes in creation. (ICR Tenet #3)Catholics are not forbidden from believing that the earth was created by God in a literal six-day week. But the Church certainly does not teach that "all theories of origins or development which involve evolution in any form are false". Also, on a very simple level, the Catholic Church does not teach that the Bible is to be understood in a completely literal manner. The Bible is the inspired Word of God, recorded by man and written in a way understandable to the people of that time. We do not believe that God literally dictated every word to the human writers of the Bible, nor that he revealed every particular in the realm of science and history that might relate to each individual story in order to create an air-tight absolutely literal text. The Catholic Church does teach that there are certain things that we know to be true and that science could never disprove, including: that God created the world and that he directly created man's soul. To a certain extent these simply fall outside the realm of science and so believing these presents no contradiction with an honest scientific study of human origins. However, the timing in which various creatures appeared on earth (in relation to each other) and other particulars of the creation story are touched upon by science and studied by scientists on a regular basis. If you automatically assume to be false any evidence that suggests an older earth (than what the Bible literally suggests) or a longer period of creation, you are not looking at those issues in a true scientific manner. The Catholic Church recognizes the unity of faith and reason - of religion and science - because God is the Lord of All! To simply disregard scientific ideas because they appear contradictory to the faith is to disregard Catholic teaching. St. Robert Bellarmine said that if there appears to be a contradiction, then either the scientific idea is wrong or the religious belief was wrong. If a scientific idea is wrong, there will be scientific AND theological reasons for finding it to be wrong.
The Biblical record of primeval earth history in Genesis I-II is fully historical and perspicuous, including the creation and fall of man, the curse on the creation and its subjection to the bondage of decay, the promised Redeemer, the worldwide cataclysmic deluge in the days of Noah, the post-diluvian renewal of man's commission to subdue the earth (now augmented by the institution of human govemment) and the origin of nations and languages at the tower of Babel. (ICR Tenet #5)Again, the Catholic Church does not teach that the story of Genesis is fully historical, nor that it is mythological, but in fact teaches that good science helps us to understood Genesis properly. ICR's Article Portrays Hostility toward the Church and the Pope
According to the Vatican Information Service in a news release on October 23, Pope John Paul II was reported as saying that evolution is "more than just a theory." This seems to mean, despite the tenuous wording, that he now considers evolution a scientific fact...... (from Evolution and the Pope by Henry M. Morris, founder and president emeritus of ICR)It seems rather presumptious for Mr. Morris to change the Pope's words from "more than just a theory" to "a scientific fact". Clearly words mean things, and the Holy Father chose his words for a reason. Naturally, Mr. Morris also makes no distinction here between evolution and Darwinism. His comments are likely to mislead many into thinking that the Pope is embracing Darwinism, which is baloney.
Now comes the Pope with his "surprise" announcement that it is acceptable for Catholics to believe and teach evolutionism. He did include the small proviso that they should still allow God to create each human soul. Atheism thus remains inappropriate for Catholics, and that's a relief to know!..... (from Evolution and the Pope by Henry M. Morris, founder and president emeritus of ICR)First of all, there is no logical precedent for calling the Pope's "announcement" a "surprise". The Church has consistently taught for generations (if not longer) that certain portions of evolutionary theory, if proven true, would not be contradictory to our faith. What Mr. Morris calls a "small proviso" is the absolute heart of the matter! How can anyone believe the fact that God created each human soul to be less important than exactly when he created the world or whether or not man's body somehow developed from some lesser creature (in other words that man being formed out of dust was somewhat figurative. Really, which is harder to swallow - God making us from dust or from some lower creature? This shouldn't be a philosophical argument about fittingness, but a question of science regarding how God did create us.)
Pope John Paul II was Karol Wojtyla, Cardinal of Krakow when he was named pope in 1978. He had earlier been an actor and was apparently quite comfortable as a government-approved ecclesiastic in Communist Poland. When he was elected pope, his election was enthusiastically endorsed by Poland's Communist Party and by World communism in general.... (from Evolution and the Pope by Henry M. Morris, founder and president emeritus of ICR)This is some of the most incredible nonsense I've read in a while. While some of the particulars are true (I understand that the Communists endorsed his appointment over another bishop - apparently he looked like a "friendly" candidate on paper), the idea that Communists enthusiastically endorsed his election as Pope is utterly ridiculous. Even secular news agencies have traced attempts to kill the Pope to communists who knew his message was a threat to their very existence. This statement smacks so strongly of the most bizarre sort of conspiracy theorism that I find it difficult to take seriously anything this man says.
There are more and more signs that such globalism is also the aim of Pope John Paul II and other modern liberal Catholics. If so, this publicized commitment to evolutionism would contribute substantially to such a goal. All world religions -- including most of mainline Protestantism, as well as Hinduism, Buddhism, and the rest -- except for Biblical Christianity, Orthodox Judaism, and Fundamentalist Islam, have embraced some form of evolutionism (either theistic, deistic, or pantheistic) and rejected or allegorized the true record of origins in Genesis. The pope has participated in important meetings with leaders of Communism, Zen Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism, Lamaism, and others, as well as the World Council of Churches, the Trilateral Commission, the B'nai B'rith of liberal Judaism, and a wide assortment of still others. He has traveled to India, Australia, the United States, and all over the world in his bullet-proof "popemobile," speaking to immense crowds everywhere. ..... (from Evolution and the Pope by Henry M. Morris, founder and president emeritus of ICR)It is typical of conspiracy theorists to condemn people based on association. The Pope has participated in meetings with various religious leaders. What in the world would these people say about Jesus if they lived in his time? Our Lord ate with tax collectors and prostitutes! Meeting with someone or even dining with someone in no way implies consent toward their behavior or agreement with their positions! How can Our Lord or the Pope or anyone else work to convert other people unless they meet with them for goodness sake??? This whole article gives me the impression that ICR is deliberately trying to separate Catholics from the Pope and the Catholic Church by means of the complex issue of evolution. ICR's approach is incompatible with true science While their noble intention is to bring science into its proper place as the 'handmaiden' of theology, the Institute for Creation Research is unfortunately taking such a narrow view of theology (Sola Scriptura and then some!) that it clouds their scientific thinking. And it seems that when push comes to shove their means of reconciliation is to break the scientific process by ignoring certain data to get to a preconceived conclusion. In other words, they believe many things which are true, but their flawed theology leads to questionable science. Some Catholic organizations have been drawn in by ICR's persuasive arguments, and so Catholic books, websites and other resources that rely upon ICR's conclusions should be viewed with some skepticism. Reviewed by J.V.H. and A.V.H. (2-21-02)
Red Flag pages -- under construction
Religion Index
Catholic Bibles
Children's Bibles
Bible Story Books
Saint Story Collections
Individual Saint Stories
Other Stories
Family Resources
Costumes
Family Devotions
Games and Crafts
Liturgical Year Resources
Posters
Supplemental Texts
Grade School Materials
First Confession Preparation
First Communion Preparation
Grade School Texts
Supplemental Texts
Miscellaneous Materials
High School and Adult Materials
Conversion Stories
Evangelization
High School Texts
The Pope and Church History
The Life of Christ
The Blessed Mother
Holy Mass and the Blessed Sacrament
The Holy Rosary
Teacher Materials
Bible Study Helps
Resource on the Saints
Catholic Links
Source Materials
Catechisms
Catholic Bibles
Religion Tidbits
The Weight of One Mass - Overview of Church Councils
Reprinted with permission from the Catholic Society of Evangelists August 1999 Newsletter.The following true story was related to Sr. M. Veronica Murphy by an elderly nun who heard it from the lips of the late Reverend Father Stanislaus SS.CC.
One day many years ago, in a little town in Luxembourg a Captain of the Forest Guards was in deep conversation with the butcher when an elderly woman entered the shop. The butcher broke off the conversation to ask the old woman what she wanted. She had come to beg for a little meat but had no money. The Captain was amused at the conversation which ensued between the poor woman and the butcher. "only a little meat, but how much are you going to give me?"
"I am sorry I have no money but I'll hear Mass for you." Both the butcher and the Captain were good men but very indifferent about religion, so they at once began to scoff at the old woman's answer.
"All right then," said the butcher, "you go and hear Mass for me and when you come back I'll give you as much meat as the Mass is worth."
The woman left the shop and returned later. She approached the counter and the butcher seeing her said, "All right then we'll see." He took a slip of paper and wrote on it "I heard Mass for you." He then placed the paper on the scales and a tiny bone on the other side but nothing happened. Next he placed a piece of meat instead of the bone, but still the paper proved heavier. Both men were beginning to feel ashamed of their mockery but continued their game. A large piece of meat was placed on the balance, but still the paper held its own. The butcher, exasperated, examined the scales, but found they were all right. "What do you want my good woman, must I give you a whole leg of mutton?" At this he placed the leg of mutton on the balance, but the paper outweighed the meat. A larger piece of meat was put on, but again the weight remained on the side of the paper. This so impressed the butcher that he was converted, and promised to give the woman her daily ration of meat.
As for the Captain, he left the shop a changed man, an ardent lover of daily Mass. Two of his sons became priests, one a Jesuit and the other a Father of the Sacred Heart.
Father Stanislaus finished by saying "I am the Religious of the Sacred Heart, and the Captain was my father."
From that incident the Captain became a daily Mass goer and his children were trained to follow his example. Later when his sons became priests, he advised them to say Mass well every day and never miss the Sacrifice of the Mass through any fault of their own.
List of the General Councils held in the Church of God from the time of the Apostles to A.D. 1884.
From Catholic Belief by the Very Rev. Joseph Faa Di Bruno, D.D., copyright 1884
[Note from the webmaster: I think it is useful for students, particularly at the high school level, to read about the various Church councils in history and particularly what dogmas were defined and what heresies were rejected at each one. This is helpful for understanding the nature of the Church and avoiding the errors treated at each council. Because this material comes from an older text, it does not include material about the Second Vatican Council.]
The First Council of Nice (now called Isnick, in Asia Minor, about 90 miles from Constantinople), was held in the year 325 under Pope Sylvester I., in the Palace of the Emperor. There were present 318 Bishops, the Emperor Constantine the Great also assisting. Arius, Presbyter of Alexandria, was condemned for denying the divinity of the Word, or Son of God, and His consubstantiality with the Father; at this Council the greater part of what is commonly called the Nicene Creed was published.
Catholic Encyclopedia: FIRST COUNCIL OF NICAEA
The First Council of Constantinople, the ancient Byzantium, was held in 381, in the Emperor's Palace, confirmed by Pope Damasus I.; 150 Bishops and the Emperor Theodosius the Elder attended. The followers of Macedonius were condemned for denying the Divinity of the Holy Ghost and His consubstantiality with the Father and the Son. A few more things were added to the Nicene Creed.
Catholic Encyclopedia: FIRST COUNCIL OF CONSTANTINOPLE
The Council of Ephesus, Asia Minor, was held in the Church of St. Mary in 431, under Pope Celestine I. About 200 Bishops and Theodosius the Younger were present. Nestorius was deposed from his See of Constantinople, and condemned for maintaining that in Jesus Christ there were two distinct persons; a human person, born of the Virgin Mary, and the Divine person, that is, the Eternal Word. In consequence of this error he denied to the Blessed Virgin the title of Theotokos (or mother of God), contrary to the Catholic doctrine, which confesses Mary to be the Mother of that DIVINE PERSON in whom are intimately and indissolubly united, by what is called the hypostatic union, the Divine and human nature.
The Council of Chalcedon (now called Scutari), facing Constantinople, in Asia Minor, under Pope Leo the Great, was held in 451, in the Church of St. Euphemia the Martyr, near the Bosphorus in Bithynia. Paschasinus and Lucentius, Bishops, and Boniface, Priest, presided at this Council as Legates of Pope Leo the Greta. Six hundred and thirty Bishops, and the Roman Emperor Marcian were present. Papal Supremacy was acknowledged. Eutyches, Abbot of Constantinople, and Dioscorus, Archbishop of Alexandria, were condemned for teaching that in JESUS CHRIST there was only one nature.
The Second Council of Constantinople, held in the Sacristy of the Cathedral in 553, and confirmed by Pope vigilius. 165 Bishops, and the Emperor Justinian, were present. Though neither the Pope nor his Legates attended, yet the Council is considered Ecumenical from its having afterwards received the sanction of the Pope. The so-called 'Three Chapters' or heretical writings of Theodorus of Mopsuesta, and of Theodoretus and of Iba, favoring the already anathematized doctrines of Nestorius, were condemned.
Catholic Encyclopedia: SECOND COUNCIL OF CONSTANTINOPLE
The Third Council of Constantinople, held in the Hall of the Imperial Palace, in the years 680 and 681, under Pope Agatho, attended by 170 Bishops. The Monothelites, with their leaders, Cyrus, Sergius, and Pyrrhus, were condemned for maintaining, as their name implies, that in JESUS CHRIST there was only one operation and one will, namely, the Divine Will. This heresy attempted to revive under a new form the error of Eutyches, which had been already condemned. Pope Agatho dying before the Council came to an end it was confirmed by Leo II., his successor, who translated the Acts of this Council from Greek into Latin.
The Second Council of Nice, held in the Church of St. Sophia in 787, under Pope Adrian I., attended by 367 Bishops. In this Council the Iconoclasts (image breakers) were condemned for rejecting the use of holy images, and the practice of paying them due respect. The last Session of this Council was held at Constantinople.
Catholic Encyclopedia: Nicaea, Second Council of
The Fourth Council of Constantinople, held in the Church of St. Sophia in 869 and 870, under Pope Adrian II., attended by 102 Bishops. The Patriarch Photius, the author of the Greek Schism, was condemned and deposed, and St. Ignatius was restored to his See of Constantinople, which had been unjustly usurped by Photius. This is the last General Council held in the Eastern part of Christendom.
The First Council of Lateran, held in the Basilica of St. John Lateran, in Rome, in 1123, under Pope Calistus II., attended by 300 Bishops and 600 mitred Abbots. The contest regarding investitures, or appointment to benefices, was settled. The rights of the Church and of the Emperors in the important matter of election of Bishops and Abbots were regulated.
The Second Council of Lateran, held at Rome in 1139, under Pope Innocent II., attended by 1000 Bishops, the Pope himself presiding. The errors of the Albigenses and the heresies of Peter De Bruys and his disciple, Arnold of Brescia, were condemned and the schism of Peter Leo was repressed. One of the decrees of this Council anathematized those heretics who rejected Infant Baptism, the Holy Eucharist, the Priesthood, and Matrimony.
The Third Council of Lateran, held at Rome in 1179, under Pope Alexander III., who presided in person. It was attended by 300 Bishops. The errors of the Waldenses were condemned and a better form of electing the Sovereign Pontiff was prescribed. Most beneficial rules were also framed for the electsion of Bishops, for regulating the rights of patrons, and for the gratuitous instruction of the people, especially of poor children.
The Fourth Council of Lateran, held at Rome in 1215, under the great Pope Innocent III., attended by 412 Bishops and upward of 800 Abbots and Friars, besides the representatives of all Sovereigns and Princes of Christendom. A short exposition of the Catholic Faith was drawn up in opposition to the errors of the time, especially those of the Albigenses and the Waldenses. Ecclesiastical laws were framed for the reformation of morals among Christians. The obligation of Confession for adults, instead of several times a year, was reduced to once a yer at least; and Holy Communion likewise to at least once a year, and that at Easter-time. A decree authorizing an expedition (known as Crusade) for the recovery of the Holy Places in Palestine was likewise published, and the election of Frederci II., of Germany, as Roman Emperor was confirmed.
The First Council of Lyons, ancient Lugdunum (Rhone), France, held in 1245 in the Monastery of St. Just, under Pope Innocent IV>, who himself generally presided, attended by 140 Bishops and many Abbots and Procurators of Chapters. There was also present Baldwin, Emperor of Constantinople, with other Princes and various Ambassadors. The Emperor, Frederic II., (a noted persecutor of the Church, who, owing to the aid of Pope Innocent III., his godfather, ascended the throne of the German Empire) was excommunicated and desposed after a powerful defence made y his Imperial representatives and advocates, had been heard.
The Second Council of Lyons, held in the Church of St. John in 1274, under Pope Gregory X., attended by 500 Bishops of the Latin and the Greek Rite, nearly 70 Abbots and about 1000 minor Prelates, the Pope presiding in person. The schismatic Greeks returned to the unity of the Church, acknowledging the Pope as the head of the whole Church, of the Greek as well as of the Latin Rite.
The Council of Vienna in France, the ancient Vienne Allobrogum (Isere, Dauphiny), was held in the Metropolitan Church in the year 1311 and 1312, under Pope Clement V. There were 300 Bishops and many other Prelates present. The Order of Knights Templars was abolished. The errors of the Begards, who pretended that man is capable of attaining such perfection in this life as to become impeccable (or incapable of sinning), even when freely gratifying the evil propensities of the body, were condemned.
The Council of Constance or Constantia, on the Lake of Constance, Baden, was assembled in 1414, when, owing to the interference of States, there were three candidates contending for the Papal Chair, namely - John XXIII., Gregory XII., and Benedict XIII. It was attended by about 200 Bishops and a number of other Prelates. At this Council the serious schism caused by this usurpation which had so long disturbed the Church of God ended, and the errors of John Wickliff and others were condemned. In November 1417, Pope Martin V. was recognized by all as the lawfully elected Pope, and he, presided over the Council until it closed. In the last Session Pope Martin V. approved and ratified all that the Council had defined conciliariter, that is, according to the strict rules of defining in General Councils and, therefore, in these definitions the Council was received as Ecumenical, although it does not rank among the Ecumenical Councils, because in some of its Sessions it was not strictly Ecumenical.
The Council of Florence, Italy, held in 1438 and 1439, under Pope Eugenius IV. Attended by 200 Bishops of the Latin and of the Greek Rite, and by the Emperor of the Greeks, John Paleologus. The Supremacy of the Pope over the whole Church was declared. Once more the Eastern and Russian Schismatic Bishops who were present submitted to the Supremacy of the Pope, and were thereby re-united to the Catholic Church.
The Fifth Council fo Lateran, held at St. John Lateran, Rome, A.D. 1512-1517, under Popes Julius II and Leo X., attended by 120 Bishops. Many representatives of Kings and Princes were also present. It abolished the Pragmatic Sanction, that is, the collection of 38 decrees, which the Council of Bale had published concerning the rights and prvileges of the Roman Pontiff, the authority of Councils, the election of Prelates, and other ecclesiastical matters. The dogma relating to the immortality of the soul was defined. The Council fo Pisa was condemned, and the ecclesiastical discipline reformed. An impulse was given to an expedition or crusade against the Turks, who were at the time threatening to overrun Christendom.
The Council of Trent (in the Austrian Tyrol), held between 1545 and 1563 under the Popes Paul III., Julius II., Marcellus II, Paul IV, and Pius IV. It was attended by about 200 Bishops, 7 Abbots, and 7 Generals of Religious Orders, and by the Representatives fo Kings and Princes. Including an adjournment of four years, and a suspension of ten years, this Council lasted eighteen years. The Catholic doctrines regarding the Holy Scripture, Tradition, Original Sin, Justification, and the Seven Sacraments, were clearly explained; the contrary errors were condemned, and abuses in morals and discipline were reformed.
The Vatican Council held in the Basilica of St. Peter, Rome, was opened on the 8th of December 1869, and continued to the 18th of July 1870. It was summoned by Pope Pius IX., of glorious memory, who presided occasionally in person, but generally by his Legates. The Patriarchs, Archbishops, and Bishops, present at this Council, at any time between December the 8th, 1869, and July the 18th, 1870, were 704. This number included 113 Archbishops and Bishops in partibus infidelium (in infidel regions), of whom all but 38 held the office of Administrator, Auxiliary, Coadjutor, Vicar-Apostolic, or Prefect-Apostolic. In this Council the dogma of the Supremacy of St. Peter and his Successors, previously recognized in the First Council of Ephesus, A.D. 431, and more fully explained in the Council of Florence, A.D. 1438, was again solemnly affirmed and defined. This dogma of faith teaches that on St. Peter was conferred a Primacy of Jurisdiction over the other Apostles, and over the whole flock of Jesus Christ, and that the Bishop of Rome is the successor of St. Peter in that jurisdiction. It was also declared that this jurisdiction extends over the whole Church on earth, and over every member of the Church, and that all the faithful are bound to submit to it, not only in things that belong to faith or morals, but also in things that belong to the discipline and government of the Church. At this Council the Pope's infallibility, when speaking ex cathedra in matters of Faith or Morals, was also solemnly defined. Besides the Supremacy and the Infallibility of the Pope, this Council also defined the existence of a personal God against the daring attacks of modern infidelity. Some people wrongly imagine that the dogma of the infallibility of the Pope is a new doctrine, because it was for the first time defined explicitly as an article of faith at the Vatican Council; but they who argue thus might with as much reason assert that the dogma which teaches the existence of a personal God is also a new doctrine because that article of the faith was for the first time defined as a dogma (in order to oppose modern heresy) in this Council, or that the dogma of the immortality of the soul was a new doctrine because it was first defined at the Fifth Council of Lateran, A.D. 1512-15127. This Vatican Council issued likewise some very important decrees relating to Discipline.